on beheading gays and Noahide LGBTQs

It's time for Christians to admit they will never get rid of their gay problem.  Christianity is too tolerant of idolatry, blasphemy, and homosexuality, and so Christian nations are overrun with such Canaanites. The biggest selling point of Noahidism to Christians is that unlike them, Noahides actually kill sodomites. You cannot have a nation that preaches against homosexuality when such people are allowed to walk around freely promoting their lifestyle, if you don't execute them they will influence society and one day throw you and the Noahide morals out of power. Christians are very stupid to allow their enemies to grow in the midst. 

However, there is an unfortunate element of Noahidism we must discuss and that is the only homosexual action that is punishable by death is male homosexual sodomy.  Gay oral sex, kissing, romance, lesbianism, transvestitism, and perhaps even transsexualism are all legal under Noahide, or at least one cannot be punished for these actions, though they are all considered lewd. 

Does this make the Noahide Laws sound hypocritical?  I guess the difference would be that in a Noahide state the people would have access to scripture which belittles such lewd but legal practices. However, we have to deal with the fact that, unlike sodomites, we cannot execute these people. So what to do?

The creators of the Noahide Laws were very knowledgeable and there must be a reason why they only banned sodomy.  I think that it is obvious that throughout history moral people have always had more outrage over homosexual sodomites than they have lesbians. There is something particularly evil and wicked about male homosexual sodomites, something that goes beyond what we see in lesbians, transvestism, or gay males who avoid anal sex. This intensified wickedness on the part of male sodomites is relatively visible in the LGBTQ community.  

First of all, back in the day we only said "gay", there was no LGBTQ, when people thought of homosexuality they thought of two men, that was the major point, not lesbians. Bisexuals and lesbians until relatively recently had a hard time getting recognized by the larger society, the focus was always on gay males.  Gay males were the leaders and shakers of the gay rights movement, they were the most egregious sinners. LGBTQ porn is dominated by sodomite males rather than other LGBTQs. Gay males are the energy of the LGBTQ movement, or at least they used to be, they used to be the star, but not anymore. 

Today, Lesbians and the trans movement have a lot more attention, and cis gay men are kinda viewed as the new straight people, the majority, the people who were at the top, calling all the shots, getting all of the attention. This actually works in our favor because lesbians and bisexuals and trans persons and homosexual men who do not engage in anal sex actually may feel like they have been suppressed and pushed aside by cis gay sodomite men. This can be used against gay sodomites by offering other LGBTQs the Noahide laws with the stipulation that their sexual practices would not be violated, only cis gay men who engage in sodomy would be executed. We need to convince other LGBTQs to get rid of the competition and the ones who have been moving their movement in the worst of directions. Male sodomites are the worst of the worst, and perhaps god gave us the other LGBTQs as a means to get rid of them. 

Noahide ethno-nationalism is the future, think "White Noahidism"

Have you ever heard someone say "White Sharia"?  This is a term used by the dissident far right to describe basically something close to Islamic Sharia which would be correct on women and gays, but it has a twist in that it is also used to enforce White Nationalism. There really is nothing in Islam that would support this kind of program really so this would be an aberration of Islam, and it would not likely gain support from the wider Islamic community. 

However, Noahidism is different, Noahidism actually promotes ethno-nationalism. According to Judaism, when Noah and his three sons exited the ark, the children they had amounted to 70 tribes or nations.  These were the different ethnic groups of the world, each divided into their own nation. God gave each group their own distinct identity so that they could positively affect the world in a unique way.  With each group giving their unique expression to human civilization, they would all work in harmony to make a better world.  This is what would have happened if they had continued to follow the Noahide Laws, but they didn't/ 

Though the Sanhedrin over in Israel is unofficial, it is still respected and many Noahides go there to pledge their allegiance to the Sanhedrin. According to the Sanhedrin, HaShem's plan is for all of the world's ethnic groups to have their own nation, and that mass migration between nations is the plan of the secular "New World Order" (Yes, if the Rabbis admit the NWO exists so can we). While Hashem does not forbid interracial marriage, and this is a decision which is made by the individual, mass race-mixing is not HaShem's plan for humanity. He wants different ethnic groups and races to exist. 

Today, especially in the west, there is increasing ethnic strife due to mass immigration.  As the different races mix in America, more discontent and violence occur.  While America will likely never be sorted out ethnically, Europe is actually the indigenous home to white people, and so each nation in Europe could more easily slow don't its immigration and work to increase the native population. Of course, Noahide ethnon-nationalism is not limited to white people, all races of the earth should be living in ethno-nationalism.

In Judaism, these nations are the "70 gates" by which the non-Jews enter the World To Come, 70 expressions of Noahidism which are created unique by the unique ethnic expression of the tribe from which it came. When all the tribes of the earth have their own home and their own culture, and are all Noahide, we will have peace

If Jews had promoted Noahide since the beginning, there would be no anti-Semitism

Why are so many people anti-Semitic?  I guess in the early Christian years they were hated for rejecting Christ, something they would not be able to make up for simply by being social conservatives.  However, today, in the present, those who hate Jews usually hate them because they are disproportionately involved in liberal and leftist causes.  Jews are viewed as being behind Communism, feminism, gay rights, racial equality, and a general anti-Christianity. 

Maybe these accusations are true, but they are true for liberal Jews only. Orthodox Jewry has always shunned these movements.  The problem is that Orthodox Jewry has not been loud enough in their condemnation of liberalism and leftism, it was until now the liberal Jews who took the stage. 

But that is all changing now that the Orthodox have finally started promoting the Noahide Laws. The Noahide movement only started as early as the 60s or 70s, and until recently there were few Rabbis involved in disseminating Noahide information, though they did make inroads in government by getting the U.S. congress and president to recognize the Noahide Laws as the foundation of American civilization. 

The Noahide Laws appeared in the Talmud more than 1600 years ago, when Christianity was young and Islam had not even been invented yet.  What if Jews had preached the Noahide Laws from the beginning?  First, could it have tempted Christians and Muslims away from their religion and into joining the Noahide community?  Yes, it could have, and there would have been less Muslims and less Christians. With more help on their side, the Jews could have easily fared better during the middle ages. 

But again, the problem today is liberal Jews.  What would have happened if the Orthodox had been preaching the Noahide Laws all this time?  What if the Jews were viewed as a source of social conservatism rather than leftism?  What if Jews were busy opposing gay marriage and abortion?  What if Jews took a hardline against idolatry and said it should not be permitted in society?  What if Jews told Christians they should not allow blasphemy in their midst.  Isn't this good advice on how to maintain a healthy civilization?  What would have been the Christian or Muslim argument against the Noahide Laws? Really nothing. 

If Jews had been promoting traditional values since the start and especially the Noahide Laws, I suspect there would be many more Noahides today and the Christians and Muslims and White Nationalists would not despise Judaism as much as they do.  Jews can correct this measure by promoting the Noahide Laws louder than liberal Jews shout their leftism.  When Noahidism is taught by every Rabbi, anti-Semitism will all but disappear. 

Why Noahidism is a more free system than Islam

Muslims say that their Quranic system is an alternative to Noahidism, that it provides all the same moral ques, that is outlaws idolatry, blasphemy, sexual immorality, theft, murder, cruel animal slaughter, and lawlessness.  Often times Muslims will tell you that the only reason you would choose Noahidism over Islam is because you are Islamophobic. First of all, choosing the Torah over the Quran as your guiding system is not Islamophobia, you have made a personal choice that Muslims have not chosen for themselves, that does not mean you hate Muslims. Also, Muslims have chosen the Quran over the Torah, so doesn't that mean they would be Anti-Semitic under their own logic? 

So why would someone dare to reject the Quran as Muslims would see it?  First, there is a major difference between Noahidism and Islam, and that is that Noahidism only tells you what you cannot do (the command to set up courts can be worded as "no lawlessness"). Islam on the other hand tells you what you must do.  Islam sets up a series of positive commands which are necessary to run an Islamic state.  Islam does not just survive on banning idolatry, blasphemy, and sexual immorality, it tells you what to do. 

What if you don't want to do things the way the Quran says? What if you have your own system you would like to implement?  Noahidism gives you freedom to set up your government any way you want, just so long as you insert the negative Noahide commands into your constitution.  So if Noahidism were to come to the United States, nothing would have to change except there could be no freedom of religion and freedom of speech would not include blasphemy.  Otherwise, the way the system runs would stay in tact. Here are some of the stipulations Islam would impose on a Western nation:

• A one party system (Quran 30:31-32). what if you want political parties to be able to flourish?
• Non-Muslims have religious freedom (Quran 2:256). Noahidism does not allow freedom of religion, idolatry is totally prohibited in Noahidism.  Also, Islam allows private idolatry in your own home, your relatives cannot turn you in for idolatry for worshipping idols in your house. Noahidism on the other hand allows relatives to be witnesses against you.
• Terms of inheritance are demanded by fractions to each eligible inheritor.  What if you wish to have a different distribution of inheritance among your relations? 
• Usury (capitalism) is abolished.  A Noahide may practice capitalism. 
• No eating pork, a Noahide may eat pork.
• Do not accumulate mass wealth (Quran 9:34-35, 104:6-7, 59:7). Noahides are not given any recommendation to curb their earnings. 
• The Islamic State may confiscate any Muslim's land if they deem the owner is not using it productively to help the community.  

These are not unreasonable objections to Islam. Anyone who wants the freedom to chose their own governing laws is not Islamphobic, they are simply more free people. Noahidism is a better and more free system.